Despite all the complaining I do about the town I grew up in, you can’t fault it’s beauty. The leaves are changing colour and I’m surrounded by seas of yellow, gold, red, brown and green.

It’s another Red Friday. I can’t wait until I get to see the hubby and have my new Red Friday t-shirt. I can finally stop wearing my mother’s clothes on Fridays!

There’s so much going on in the news today – Carolyn Bennett dropping out of the Liberal leadership campaign (surprise, surprise – NOT!). I ought to be ashamed to say that I really didn’t have a clue who she was before she announced her intentions to run, she didn’t make any sort of impact over the past few months, and I’m not the least bit surprised by her departure. Perhaps she should have considered raising her public profile outside of Toronto before attempting to gain the leadership of a national party.

Then again what does it say about your abilities to raise your profile when I know more about a former ex-pat running for the position (Ignatieff) than I do about Ms. Bennett. Perhaps I should be mortified that I know little to nothing about neither Ms. Bennett nor Martha Hall-Findlay – the only other female candidate. In fact, I couldn’t pick their names, faces, political histories, or ridings out of any wet paper bags. The male candidates are all familiar to me – at minimum I know their names, a bit about their doings (or lack thereof) in parliament, and have some idea of the platforms they’re campaiging on.

I have no idea if this is the result of a media bias against the female candidates or if they just did absolutely nothing to place themselves in my line of vision over the last few months…either way, I will have forgotten Ms. Bennett’s name in a few weeks and this disturbs me not at all.

Technorati Tags: canadian politics, liberal leadership, carolyn bennett

After years of domination and subjugation to the whims of Chretien and the wishy-washy rudderless stylings of Paul Martin, I can’t believe a Liberal leadership candidate said the following (Source: Yahoo! News):

Canadians have an obligation to keep their “moral promise” to Afghans despite a mounting death toll, Liberal leadership contender Michael Ignatieff said Wednesday as the bodies of five more soldiers returned home from the battlefield. “This is an agonizing mission for Canadians but it’s a mission that amounts to a moral promise,” Ignatieff said following a rally in downtown Toronto where he unveiled a new campaign platform. “It’s a promise in which Canada said ‘We’re going to help Afghans get their country back on its feet.’ And the Canada I love and the Canada I respect always keeps its promises.”

It’s like a breath of fresh air…a potential Liberal leader who is willing to take a stand. It’s not necessarily a popular one, and might hurt his credibility with a large portion of his party members, but he’s made his views known for good or evil. The line has been drawn in the sand. We know which side Ignatieff stands on on this issue.

Just don’t scroll down the article too far or you’ll bump into the following statement:

The former academic said that the Liberals need to be strong, bold leaders because the country is tired of being “manipulated” by Stephen Harper’s Conservatives.

I know I’m young (only been voting for just over a decade) and blonde – so I have two strikes against me – but I just can’t get over the audacity of Ignatieff’s statement. Harper’s Conservatives have yet to hold power for 12 consecutive months and hold a minority government at that. They can’t manipulate anything without the support – overt or tacit – of the other sitting party members. For example, the government could have easily been brought down over the budget vote, but weren’t. Canada assumed command of the Kandahar Province Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) before the Conservatives took the reins (August 2005). All the Conservatives did was extended the pre-existing Liberal committment (from 2007 to 2009).

Now, read the highlighted statement (above) from the article again. Please tell me how we’re being manipulated by the Conservatives while the Liberals are shiney, spanking clean of any manipulation related tarnish? Obviously, I’m missing something important in the nuances of Canadian politics.

It’s days like this where I’m really glad that I vote for politicians based on their personal convictions, local platforms, and past histories rather than on party affiliation. If I based decisions based on blindly following a party into the brink, I don’t think I could live with myself.

Technorati Tags: Ignatieff, moral promise, Afghanistan, Liberals, Conservatives

Canoe is running an article about Liberal leadership candidate Gerard Kennedy and his anti-wage gap proposals.

Liberal leadership hopeful Gerard Kennedy is proposing an ambitious plan to erase the wage gap between men and women.The plan includes dramatically boosting day care spaces, eliminating inequities in the tax system and collaborating with business and labour to make the work force more equitable and hospitable for women.

You know, it’s stuff like this that really annoys me. I think my parents, having been members of the silent generation (rather than boomers). instilled a completely different concept of equity and ethics in me than those that Mr. Kennedy received.

Kennedy said his plan would not only give working women the income boost they deserve, it would lure up to 1.6 million more women into the work force.

Did anyone ask these 1.6 million women why they’re not in the workforce? Perhaps they’ve chosen to stay home and raise children themselves? Perhaps they absolutely HATED working and instead decided to dedicate themselves to volunteer work or gardening? Perhaps the little green aliens told them never to work or they wouldn’t get their fair share of green cheese when the moon explodes…

And while I’m in the midst of wondering what questions have and have not been asked – I feel the need to ask one of my own – just how many men are unemployed or underemployed in Canada? Who is doing anything to help them increase their job satisfaction, numbers in the work force or increase their salaries?

If no special programs or special interest group is aiding men, why in this day and age are we still insistant that programs such as these need to exist to help women? Oh, that’s right. According to someone somewhere (I believe this statement should be attributed to the articles author, Joan Brydan, and not Gerard Kennedy)…

Women currently earn about 75 per cent of the income earned by men with the same education and experience.

I really have a hard time accepting the validity of the above statement. Whenever I see it my blood starts to boil. Mainly, it’s because I’m still waiting for a copy of the research that generated this conclusion and recent research that confirms the conclusion is still valid. Perhaps I’m just completely clueless when it comes to the working world, but in my experience and knowing the salaries of both my male and female friends working in the same company as I do, I can honestly say that gender doesn’t seem to make one iota of difference when it comes to our wages.

For example, when I first moved into the world of IT,(Information Technology) there were few women working in the field. In my limited experience, promotions were based on ability and I had to prove my abililities in order to move ahead. Once I had “arrived”, I was paid exactly the same as every other male I worked with who had the same hiring profile (date of hire, job/position held, etc.). We worked the same shifts, did the same job, and were paid exactly the same.

Now, if I were to compare my salary when I was working in Manitoba to my salary when working in Edmonton, then I’d have to note that there was a difference in what I was paid. There is no way to attribute this change to gender, as the position I held was the same in both cities. I worked for the same company. What changed was the cost of living and taxes allotments.

Extending that further, if I were to compare what I am making working for Company X in Edmonton to what I could make working in the same position in Company Y, then differences exist there as well.

When I shifted from IT to ID (Instructional Design), I was once again starting at the bottom. Just like before, I am doing the same job, for the same money as my male counterparts. Sure, I’d love to get a promotion and earn more. Before I can do that, I need to EARN the promotion. I need to expand my skills, education, experience and ultimately my abilities. As much as I fantasize about my boss announcing that I’ve passed the final hurdle and will now be able to add the fabled “Sr.” to my job title and collect the pretty pay raise, I do recognize that it’s something I still need to work towards.

Did gender matter in any of these situations? Not in the slightest. Skills, abilities, education and experience all came in to play.

What does make a difference are the choices we make. Which field of study do we follow? Where do we choose to live and work? Who stays home with the children (if there are any)? These are all choices people make during the course of their lives.

So if choice, skills and abilities outweigh gender, how is Gerard Kennedy planning to save the world and right the wrongs done to women?

Create a workplace issues forum, bringing together government, labour and business to examine ways to make the work force more hospitable to women, including job sharing, flexible hours, better paid maternity leaves and encouraging more women to take apprenticeship programs in skilled trades.

• Job Sharing? That’s existed for over 20 years. Perhaps not in every field, but whether or not it’s available is often driven by the needs of the business. My mom participanted in a job sharing program back in the 70’s and carried through to her retirement working different positions in a job sharing manner.
• Flexible Hours? Again, this is something that has existed in many fields for decades. Once again, I think you can attribute whether or not it’s available in a specific field to whether or not it makes sound financial sense for whoever is signing the paycheque.
• Better paid maternity leaves? You’re kidding me right? I give birth and I can have my absence from work partially covered for up to 50 weeks per child. A family member needs end of life care and I have to share a 6 week benefit term with everyone else who may be helping to handle palliative care needs. Good thing I have flexible hours (and locations) so I can work from home and care for my family members in need.
• Encouraging more women to take appreticeship programs in skilled trades? Aha! Here’s an idea I can support. Within reason of course. If a woman wants to learn a trade and has the base skill set to do so, it should 100% be available to her. If she needs assistance reaching that base skill set (literacy or numeracy) that too should be available. However, I just can’t see how this one bullet point is worthy of a significant chunk of a 7 billion $$ budget.

I’ve finally found something I can support and then Gerard pours a bucket of ice over my head. It’s statements like the one below that will stop me from voting Liberal again any time soon.

“We in the Liberal party should be making this one of our tenets as we go forward . . . A lot of the things we think we’ve done for social equity aren’t done yet.”

Social equity? I highly doubt that. If that were the case, then it wouldn’t be socially acceptable to ridicule men and place the bulk of the blame for all societies ills at their feet.

Sure, there once was a case for affirmative action. Women did have a hard time breaking the glass ceiling. Jobs were menial and women were shut out of many fields. In Canada, this has changed.

There was nothing stopping me from choosing the career path I followed. Nothing stopped me from choosing to walk away from that field and shift to an entirely different one. Sure, there were trade-offs. I had to go back to school in my late 20’s after a near 10 year absence from academia. I had to juggle family, work and writing papers. I didn’t get to go on fancy vacations because I was busy paying tuition. I didn’t accept the offer of a higher paying job because I wanted the flexibility available in my current position. We took a long time to save up and purchase our small home and drive a beaten up ol’ chevy that’s desperately in need of being put out to pasture.

Through it all, I had a choice.

I wish to gawd that federal Liberals would learn to respect people’s choices and allow people to learn to accept responsibility for the results of their own choices. In my not so humble opinion, cradle to grave care is killing this country!

h/t: Dust my Broom

Authors’ Note: I not-so-secretly harbour the desire to stop working and spend my life enrolled in classes and learning about anything that strikes my fancy. I’d temper my permanent student status with volunteer time at local animal shelters. Of course, that’s assuming I don’t need to work – which I do – and that’s why it’s called a “fantasy life”. In essence, if I didn’t have to be in the workforce, I doubt I would be…I’d be in a library instead!

Technorati Tags: Gerard Kennedy, wage gap, choices

In an editor’s note on at Perceval Press, vm writes:

These are not signs of a modern, democratic society. The present situation, however, is as avoidable as it is barbaric. The remedies are willpower and integrity. If we do not demand a serious effort from our political representatives, nothing much will change anytime soon.

Specifically, the author is describing the current situation of the American Health Care system and the lack of a universal heath care program. As a Canadian, I can’t help but agree that universal health care is definitely something every country should have in place. No one should ever have to worry about having to choose between food, shelter, clothing or proper medical care. It’s discomforting to consider that our own health care system is degrading to the point where universal health care may no longer be provided to all Canadian citizens.

However, it strikes me that the passage I’ve highlighted above can refer to so many other ills in the US, Canada and on a global scale. Can the same not be said for addressing illiteracy and the cost and availablility of education? Shouldn’t we follow the same recommendations when attempting to resolve hunger? Can we not avoid a repeat of a situation such as the one that happened in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina by exercising our political will and voices? Is it not possible to erase poverty worldwide in our lifetime?

In Canada, the percentage of eligible voters taking the time to exercise their voting rights has been decreasing in past elections. In 1997, 67% voted in the Federal election. In 2000, the voting percentage decreased to 61%. This slid futher to 60.5% in 2004 before an unprecedented upswing to 64.9% in 2006.

If we want to see change the the world around us (both locally and globally) we need to start with participating in the voting process. Once this is complete, it’s not sufficient to sit back out our laurels for another 3-5 years. We must remain active in the process – holding our politicians accountable for their actions and policies, or lack thereof.

Note: I do not know how long the full editorial will appear on the page. The page updates regularly. To read the entire commentary, I recommend visiting the page soon.

Technorati Tags: perceval press, universal health care, voting

It’s frightening that in Canada we’re now jailing people who haven’t been formally charged with a crime. But in this case, I can’t help but wonder if the action is worth the possible slippery slope it appears this court decision puts us on. Specifically, the news that Racist web postings land white supremacist in jail is welcome. The disturbing element is that the jail time (9 months) has been assigned without the laying of criminal charges. I’m not a lawyer, so perhaps ignoring a pre-existing court order is sufficient to get around the requirement to be charged with an office before being jailed.

Feel free to educate me in the comments.

You have to wonder about the type of home environment people with these views grew up in. I’m tired of the old “child of immigrants” schtick. I’m the child of immigrants and I certainly was never taught to believe anything of this nature. In fact, I’d have to say my parents taught me that people are to be viewed on a individual (personal) basis based on what they say and do. Painting entire swaths of people with the same brush is ludicrious.

h/t to the Blogging Party of Canada

Technorati Tags: white supremacist in jail, immigrants